hey guys welcome to the liberal hive
mind a channel solely focused on
exposing the abundant hypocrisy of the
left well folks magistrate judge bruce
reinhardt the federal judge who signed
off on the search warrant to raid donald
trump's mar-a-lago home just a couple
days ago he rejected a doj motion to
keep the trump mar-a-lago raid affidavit
sealed because of its historical
significance i mean the president of the
united states home being raided isn't
really a small thing especially
historically it's something that people
are going to be talking about for
decades possibly hundreds of years it's
now part of american history and so he
was essentially saying that there should
be transparency in the whole thing but
of course nobody was really taking that
seriously this administration the fbi
the doj and the word transparency don't
exactly belong together in the same
sentence unless it's lack of
transparency and so pretty much as
expected the warrant affidavit has in
fact been released or it's been unsealed
except like always like all the
documents that tend to trickle out in
relation to these massive federal
agencies and government scandals or i
guess in this case potential scandals
it's been heavily redacted and i mean so
heavily redacted that we've learned
almost nothing i went through the entire
thing and for the most part well it kind
of looks something like this alright
folks well the american people deserve
transparency because of the historical
significance donald trump's home was
rated the former president of the united
states of course we wouldn't do this
without good reason and well the reason
is oh well thanks a lot epstein judge
bruce reinhardt that essentially clears
the whole thing up now doesn't it of
course it doesn't they continue to
operate in secrecy with a total lack of
transparency and they expect us to take
them seriously well folks with the
release of the heavily redacted and i
mean really heavily redacted affidavit
democrats are all posting one specific
paragraph and they're celebrating and
rejoicing i mean we really got him this
time but i'm here to tell you why pretty
much nothing has changed let me show you
guys exactly what i mean by that we've
got some stuff to cover so let's roll
the tape alright folks so with a lot of
this stuff my favorite source my go-to
source tends to be just the news let's
take a look at what they're saying fbi
warrant for trump search relied on media
reports like bungled russia fisa warrant
before it like the russia collusion fisa
warrant before it the fbi search warrant
for donald trump's florida estate relied
on multiple news media reports from
outlets such as breitbart and cbs to
justify its unprecedented request to
raid a former president's home for
instance the bureau relied on a local
cbs report to establish that trump had
moved boxes suspected to contain
documents from the white house to
mar-a-lago in mid-january 2021 just
before he left office according to the
partially redacted fbi affidavit
according to a cbs miami article titled
moving trucks spotted at mar-a-lago
published monday january 18 2021 at
least two moving trucks were observed at
the premises on january 18 2021 the memo
related and during my first read of the
affidavit this is the first thing that
absolutely shocked me i mean they're
literally quoting a cbs miami article as
probable cause or justification for this
warrant moving trucks spotted out of
mar-a-lago days before joe biden's
inauguration yeah i mean no s sherlock
donald trump has to move out of the
white house and is moving to his now
main residence in florida at mar-a-lago
how is that probable cause for a crime
and once again can somebody please for
the love of god explain to me what the
crime actually is this right here is the
part of the affidavit that leftists are
cheering on rejoicing mark this day
affidavit says this about a former
president's residence based on the
foregoing facts and circumstances i
submit that probable cause exists to
believe that evidence contraband fruits
of crime or other illegally possessed in
violation of 18 us code
the 793-2071-1519 us codes that we've
already covered before will be found at
the premises further i submit that this
affidavit supports probable cause for a
warrant to search the premises described
in attachment a and sees the items
described in attachment b those three
u.s laws all describe the destruction
obliteration concealment or misuse of
classified documents there is literally
zero actual evidence to suggest any of
that from what we understand right now
maybe behind the redacted portions but
from what i understand there is nothing
to suggest any destruction of any
documents then you read this part of the
affidavit and it says 32 cfr parts 2001
and 2003 regulate the handling of
classified information specifically
32cfr
2001.43 titled storage regulates the
physical protection of classified
information this section describes that
secret and top secret information shall
be stored in a general service
administration approved security
container a vault built to federal
standard or an open storage area
construction in accordance with 2001 53.
it also requires periodic inspection of
that container and use of an intrusive
detection system among other things so
was the issue that donald trump was not
storing the documents correctly i mean
we already know that they had actually
been to his home to make sure that he
was storing the documents in a specific
place they told him to use specific
locks i mean we've already covered all
of this stuff the question remains what
exactly is the violation and still there
is nothing to suggest there is no
argument that anyone has made to suggest
that the documents that donald trump
actually possessed were classified or
that he lacked the authority to actually
hold said documents even katherine
herridge investigative reporter from cbs
writes key sections of nara may 10th
letter describe documents quote marked
as classified or with classification
markings but this does not explain the
record's current classification status
again it's all totally unclear and even
with the unsealed affidavit or the
redacted affidavit we still don't know
what the actual issue is cbs reporting
on two moving trucks going back and
forth for mar-a-lago is that an
impeachable offense were there documents
in donald trump's possession classified
or not does donald trump as president
with unilateral declassification powers
than the right to view and hold
classified documents was he illegally in
possession of documents was he storing
them incorrectly again we have
absolutely no idea what even is the
point of all this there's another part
here from the redacted affidavit that
writes based upon this investigation i
believe that the storage room former
president of the united states
residential suite pine hall the 45
office and other spaces within the
premises are not currently authorized
locations for the storage of classified
information or ndi similarly based upon
this investigation i do not believe that
any spaces within the premises have been
authorized for storage of classified
information at least since the end of
former president's presidential
administration on january 20th 2021 so
what's the argument that after joe
biden's inauguration the former
president of the united states is no
longer authorized to store classified
information or documents i mean is that
what this whole thing was about that
donald trump was incorrectly holding
documents or storing documents that the
fbi was totally aware of and in
communication with and actually told him
to put them in a specific room under
lock and key not to mention the horrific
double standard that hillary clinton who
by the way was not president of the
united states definitely illegally had
classified documents she was let off
scot-free but apparently the former
president of the united states gets
rated for improperly housing documents
supposedly allegedly the whole thing
just doesn't make any sense and it's
even more confusing now following the
release of this affidavit i mean for
pete sakes they quoted a local cbs
article and a breitbart article has
justification or as probable cause
things were not clear before and we were
hoping that this affidavit would give us
more information and more insight and
help clear up what this whole thing was
about and if anything it's made it more
confusing i see nothing in this highly
redacted affidavit that changes my
analysis that this whole thing seems
like a massive nothing burger and the
one thing that democrats are promoting
as the smoking gun is the conclusion of
the affidavit that suggests that there
is probable cause that they believe that
there's evidence contraband or fruits of
crime or other illegally possessed
documents well obviously the affidavit
and the warrant is gonna say that i mean
that's kind of the point of a warrant
that you believe that there's probable
cause of illegal activity or wrongdoing
that's not a smoking gun that's kind of
the point of a warrant it's kind of what
you would say if you were applying for a
warrant the question is where's the
evidence where is the proof and most
importantly right now what's the damn
crime in the first place i still don't
get it and that's essentially the
conclusion here folks more confusion
democrats keep saying look at the
evidence look at this new bombshell
report this new document drop and i'm
just not seeing anything i'm seeing more
leftist copium and the continued deep
state coup against donald trump to stop
him at any cost essentially the status
quo remains nothing has changed that's
what i got for you guys though hopefully
you enjoyed this video if you did make
sure to leave a like and possibly
subscribe to the channel if you feel
like joining the community here i'm
gonna get back to work thanks for
watching and i'll see you on the next
one