hey everyone uh before you watch this
video I just want to let you know it's
not a chill documentary like most of my
stuff it's an opinion piece about
something that frustrates me and a
pretty opinionated one uh it's not
supposed to be 100 accurate and there's
a little bit of yelling and swearing and
throwing things in the back half so if
those vibes are upsetting I won't mind
if you skip this one
this is the HP capture 920 and we're not
here to talk about it we're not here to
talk about my Split Lip either we'll see
how that goes we need this to get where
I want to go though so we'll set that
aside and start with a bogus question
who do we have to thank for the car I
made the obvious First Step Google who
invented the car it's Carl Benz there's
your answer if you want to take the Long
View you can go on to say well many
other people worked on designs over a
long period slowly crystallized into
what we have now and that's all very
true but you could also just say Henry
Ford and I think that's true too he
didn't invent the car hell the thing he
was most well known for doesn't really
resemble anything we drive now but he
put them in everyone's driveway and
that's what matters right the car as we
know it as a machine that an enormous
number of people can afford to own and
operate something that's culturally
ubiquitous that started with the Ford
Motor Company by most perspectives and
that's more relevant in most
conversations than who invented
something and there's a lot of other
things whose inventor we could debate
but what I find fascinating is what does
and doesn't get the honor of a
colloquial history at all some things we
don't know or care or discuss who
invented them or even who popularized
them even stuff we use every day one
example is the optical Mouse I think
these were revolutionary or more
accurately I think the ball mouse was a
crime against humanity I mean they're
just terrible it was a miserable idea it
was the only computer peripheral that
was without question dirty it's full of
literal dirt at all times no matter how
clean your environment was you know were
these really all that bad yes
I say they are the fact that I ever had
to clean one of these is stupid and I
knew that when this was current
technology I hated the ball Mouse by the
time I was conscious and I celebrated my
first Optical one which looked a lot
like this it turned a finicky filthy
device into one so clean and reliable
that you could go 10 years using the
same one with no maintenance without
ever paying it a second thought now we
all benefit from this tremendously but
the question of who invented it doesn't
come up I've never heard anyone talk
about it you can feel free to Google it
but I think the answer you'll get is
useless and misleading Google says it
was Xerox and I think that's even more
wrong than saying it was Carl Benz so
let's get out in front of that uh the
first known Optical mouse was invented
in 1980 at Xerox by one Richard F lion
and I talked about it in a video about a
different Mouse a while back it was a
successful product it was sold with
Xerox and Sun workstations people were
using them in the early to mid 80s do
their jobs and I don't care and that
doesn't matter
Because by the history I found xerox's
accomplishment has nothing to do with us
it's not why I got to use Optical mice
like these for the last 20 years in fact
even Richard Lyon himself later asserted
that his Mouse had been largely
forgotten before being reinvented and it
took me a while to work out how that
happened but it turns out he was
absolutely correct we don't owe Xerox
anything for this enormous Improvement
to computer usability
we owe Hewlett-Packard and this failed
product
how little can I say about this it's
from 1998 it's called the HP cap share
and I just couldn't manage to make this
video about it I tried to care but I
don't it's of no consequence it was a
flop it was a one-trick pony and it's a
trick we've already seen before because
it's the predecessor in every sense to
the Halo scanner Mouse I reviewed a few
months ago and it does the exact same
thing uh the Halo was a 2010s design and
it works like this you set it on
document that you want to scan you
slowly move it around and a camera on
the bottom takes pictures that are
assembled into a larger image by keeping
track of how you move and using
algorithms to extrapolate how the photos
fit together that's a mouthful but I'm
rolling some footage it's probably
pretty obvious what's going on the cap
share does the same thing and the only
real difference is that instead of a
conventional camera it uses a linear
sensor like you'd find in like a flatbed
scanner you can only capture one line at
a time it's also black and white and it
doesn't need to be connected to a PC to
operate but otherwise it's the same
thing and it's not very remarkable but
how it works is or more accurately the
fact that it works exactly the the way
the Halo Mouse would 15 years later I
thought that Halo was interesting mostly
because of how simple it was the Imaging
was done with a webcam sensor the final
picture was computed in software but
most of the magic came from two ordinary
Optical Mouse sensors on the bottom of
the device the tele software exactly how
it's moving and rotating and the cap
share also uses a pair of optical Mouse
sensors except that in 1998 those didn't
exist and that's what this video is
about I'd love to leave it at that and
just skip the demo but you need to know
what this thing's all about so here you
put in two double a batteries you turn
it on you set an odd document you press
the button on the back and it starts
scanning As you move it around it builds
up a picture in memory and as long as
you keep it on the surface it keeps
scanning and you can capture a document
of almost any size and shape you like
when you're done it saves the scan
internally and you can view it on the
little screen on the back it even lets
you zoom in so you can make sure you got
a good copy without needing to check on
a computer although you can of course
transfer your images to a computer it
only records in one bit black and white
like a fax machine this what a good
quality copy looks like it's crisp copes
pretty well varied tones it looks like a
great product I bought it hoping it was
but I was wrong it sucks it failed and
you haven't heard of it for a reason
there's nothing this is good at that a
flatbed scanner doesn't do better not
not really it seems like it should be
more flexible it should let you scan
smaller items with less uniform surfaces
and do it in unusual conditions but it
doesn't really deliver on any of that
it's well made but it's just fragile in
principle and impractical in practice
for one thing it has no removable
storage there's no memory card you can
pull out to move all your scans to your
computer you have to transfer them one
image at a time to your PC and since
this came out in 1998 your choices for
that were over cereal or infrared both
of which were agonizingly slow so even
for the most basic tasks the workflow
sucked and it also had the same problems
that crop up every time someone tries to
make a handheld scanner I think there's
something about the concept that makes
it seem like a great idea to people like
you and me I really want one of these it
works well I always have and I think we
picture it being lightweight convenient
flexible we imagine taking it to the
library and scanning Pages out of books
but that's not really feasible and it
really can't be for a handheld scanner
to work with a free-floating document
you need to slide it over the top
without the sheet scooting around on the
desk or the scanner tilting or twisting
which will distort the image and you
need a good couple inches of free space
on all sides for the scanner to overlap
onto the desk so you can't do this
without an immaculately clean flat and
remarkably large expanse of free surface
space who the hell has that and if you
want to scan a page from a book well
good luck you're never going to get it
all the way into the crease and the page
is going to flex and twist because you
don't have any way to hold it in place
it just doesn't work and when you ask
how can we solve these problems the
answer is a flatbed the glass platen the
weight on top the head not touching the
document these Design Elements solve all
those problems and a flatbed doesn't
need a clean surface it'll work sitting
at an angle on the top of a pile of
literal garbage there's a reason this is
how we've scanned documents for over 60
years and they aren't even that big
anymore I mean they need a large platen
but the modern ones are the size of a
medium coffee table book They Don't
Really weigh anything they don't use
much power this one runs directly off
USB if someone would just make this with
a built-in battery and a screen and
storage I would take it to the library
hell I'd use it in my car God forbid you
try and use the cap chair in your car
because it's the pickiest piece of
in the world like any other hand scanner
the cap share is hard to keep straight
it is impossible to use inside a book it
doesn't work on surfaces that aren't
flat because these are all unavoidable
problems because it's a bad idea that
can't work and so the cap share cannot
fix it the only improvements it brings
to the table are that you can rotate it
up to 45 degrees without distorting the
image and you can scan things larger
than a normal flatbed could handle and
you know if that's what you need then
maybe this is useful but for most people
it isn't really worth the trade-offs
since in a lot of other ways it's
inferior even to other hand scanners the
late 80s Logitech scanman for instance
used a rubber roller to keep track of
how you moved it and that could be
pretty janky but this is worse the
captures opt vertical sensors are
designed to stop scanning if they sense
that you've picked it up well if your
document is in a completely flat item on
a completely flat surface one or the
other sensor will pop off an edge or
lift up a little and it'll get confused
and give up on the scan you don't get an
opportunity to try again like with a
scan man or even the Halo Mouse it just
gives up and your scan is ruined my
roast is ruined this means that scanning
books isn't just impractical it's
impossible because you can't fit both
sensors onto a page in most books and
even if you do they'll inevitably slide
off the edge at some point I was able to
get part of a page out of Vagabond for
instance you can see that it would have
looked great if it had finished but it
gave up when one end slid a millimeter
off the side which was totally
unavoidable and that's with a larger
than usual book a typical paperback out
of the question now I admit that doing
this on a flatbed can be awkward too but
if you don't mind bending your book a
bit it's doable instead of impossible
and there are better Solutions like the
book Edge scanners that the Seattle
library offers a portable version of one
of those would be totally feasible and
it would solve all these problems and
the cap share has even more issues for
instance it can't scan anything
reflective like the box that it came in
and that's not because it can't pick up
the image it gets a great picture but
after a couple seconds the reflection
confuses the sensors and it gives up
there's no adjustments there's no
overrides and you can easily end up with
a dozen partial scans as you struggle to
capture something that a flatbed would
Breeze through
so this is not like I had imagined when
I ordered it a better version of the
Halo Mouse from a more enlightened era
when we put more effort and forethought
into things in fact I'd say the Halo
when it worked was Superior they don't
make them like they used to is sometimes
a good thing very few genuinely novel
products in the last decade have been as
poorly thought out as some of the
spaghetti that was thrown at the wall in
the 80s and 90s so as a scanner this
really isn't noteworthy since it barely
works and even if it did it was part of
a world that didn't include most of us
and never would have there was this
explosion of handheld Computing in the
mid 90s this uh New Era where you could
sit in a room with other people
authoring documents on pocket-sized
devices and using ad hoc networking to
send them to each other with no cooling
fans or cables no ever present Wi-Fi or
LTE and none of it mattered almost
nobody really cares that any of that
happened the Palm Pilot and the pocket
PC and all that stuff didn't change the
world they were used almost entirely by
yuppies and all those product lines died
their lineage ended and nothing of them
remains in anything we use unless you
want to nitpick about this patent or
that or who invented what first or about
how some Palm engineer built on a
concept 10 years later at Danger Inc or
whatever because we would have gotten
here anyway the relatively few people
who had Palm Pilots remember them
vividly and everyone else feels that the
personal device Revolution started in
2007 when the iPhone came out because
that's when it first started to affect
people who weren't businessmen and the
iPhone would have existed without the
Palm Pilot because the idea is obvious
the defining features are fits the human
hand and has a screen and we didn't need
prior start to get there the cap share
was part of that world I'm sure it was
impressive to see in action if you got
to see it if you could afford to spend
600 on this single purpose Gadget then
you could go to the library scan some
old newspapers go home beam them
wirelessly to your IR enabled printer
and get perfect reproductions with no PC
involved bring it with you on a business
trip scan your receipts catalog them in
your Palm Pilot that's a very utopian
future but I imagine very few people
ever got to see it and the cap share
could not have changed history from
inside that market segment but the
sensors on the bottom did because they
left that market segment they
revolutionized a common product that
everyone used which was embarrassingly
Obsolete and insulting to our dignity
but they weren't even meant to do that
they were invented only to make this
device work and we know this because we
have an interview with the inventor one
Travis Blaylock who the Computer History
Museum interviewed some years ago I
emailed them for permission to use the
interview and I never got a response but
then I decided that I think it's fair
use so hopefully that goes well here he
is uh after that came the handheld
scanner project which led to the optical
Mouse and so Ross Allen in the printing
technology department he formed a little
ad hoc group called The nude Couch
Potato Office of the future task force
you know if you had no pockets or
backpack or anything else what would be
the one or two sort of handheld devices
you would really want to have if you
want the whole store you can get a
transcript on their website I've linked
that in the video below blatlock and
friends were coming up with
self-contained portable devices just
free associating new ideas and he was
asked to think of a way for a handheld
scanner to know how it was being moved
in two-dimensional space using Imaging
and cross-correlation to to measure
movement over over surfaces paper in
particular his idea was to make a camera
that looked at a tiny part of the paper
underneath it found some details in the
fibers and kept track of how their
positions changed to calculate how the
device must have moved in the real world
there are these two little Optical
navigation mod modules and these tracked
position as the scanner moved in a free
hand across across the paper we were
actually navigating on the texture of
the paper that is exactly how an optical
mouse works and it's easy to assume they
adapted the principle from Xerox into a
consumer product but he didn't and we
know that for a fact earlier in that
interview he mentions that he came up
with the idea while talking to a guy
named Bill Holland nchm also interviewed
him in Bill's interview he explains that
he accidentally stumbled on the idea of
correlation-based surface tracking when
he was working on some unrelated
projects years earlier that involves
Serendipity it was the right things came
together that produced the technology
that resulted in the optical Mouse when
we were developing the color scanner we
realized that there was some
non-uniformities in the in the CCD
sensor it became obvious that although
white paper looks white to human
observers you look down at the at the
fine level you're seeing the the
structure of fibers in the paper and
then while working with Blaylock he
passed on the idea
they described to me a little bit of the
work that bill Holland and John ertle
had done in using Imaging and
cross-correlation to to measure movement
over over surfaces Bill Hall and John
ertle had done that nice work and so I
thought well that would probably allow
us to track motion so Blaylock
integrated Bill Holland's prior work
with his ideas and developed the cap
share which ended up being a flop but he
was working with another person one Gary
Gordon whose chm also interviewed Gary
picked the ball up and ran with it pun
intended now to be fair at first he was
laboring under the common 90s
misconception that TV was going to
become interactive so his goal was
actually to make what we would Now call
a gyro Mouse which you could use to
control a cursor in midair I thought
that at one point that the television
set in the computer were going to
converge Gary Gordon he came by and he
wanted to do initially this flying mouse
is what we called it it looked out in
the room and you could wave this thing
around and it would move a cursor like
Gary was thinking about interactive TV
applications but that turned out to be a
silly idea I was not correct on that uh
and then Gary also became very
interested in turning it into a mouse it
turns out that long before any of this
nude Couch Potato nonsense Gary Gordon
had already been thinking about applying
optimal technology to a mouse and not
because he'd seen xerox's product he'd
just seen a problem that needed solving
and he already knew how to solve it I
think for several years before I used
their mechanical mice and was constantly
aggravated at him it would get dirty and
with aggravation people would slam them
on the table and blow on them and so
forth I used this on a wood surface and
I thought for many years it should be
Optical because I had seen image Target
tracking in the Navy I had studied
correlation at Stanford Gary Gordon saw
a gap that sat unfilled for far longer
than it had any right to an obvious
problem that people had been irritated
by for over a decade but nobody ever
buckled down and tried to solve it he
had figured out how to fix it years
earlier and then suddenly and
incidentally he was in possession of the
technology to create that solution and
there were projects around HP that
actually there was a scanner that
handheld scanner that looked at its
position by using optical scanning so I
thought you know we'd make an optical
Mouse Xerox had nothing to do with it
and that makes sense because in the 17
years prior nothing had happened with
their idea it hadn't made any headlines
I wouldn't be surprised if none of these
people at HP had ever used one since
they were almost exclusive to
specialized twenty thousand dollar
computers
and as far as the design itself it
wasn't even really the same thing those
Xerox mice weren't designed to work on
arbitrary surfaces their sensors only
had a 4x4 resolution not nearly precise
enough to work on paper or wood or even
a normal mouse pad you're supposed to
use them with a special pad with a
special dot pattern on it and if that
pad got dirty it would actually quit
working until you replaced it they came
in pads
if it got dirty you could tear it off
and there's another one it has a piece
of paper or you could tape it on your
desk or whatever and each page had the
reorder number on it so you can order
more if you I've heard that in practice
they would sometimes work on other
surfaces but that's incidental they
weren't supposed to they were supposed
to be used in clean controlled
institutional environments with
purchasing departments and janitors
nowhere I've ever been the cap share on
the other hand was supposed to get
thrown in your briefcase go on a plane
go to some construction site capture a
copy of a filthy contract on the spot on
whatever surface was available so it had
to be tougher its sensors used a higher
resolution about 32 by 64 and much more
sophisticated signal processing and that
made them a lot more flexible for all my
complaining about what the cap share
can't do it does manage to scan random
pieces of paper on a relatively clean
desk with remarkable consistency and
that is the thing it's designed to do I
think my complaint stands because it
could have done a lot more but for what
it's doing these sensors are excellent
and that's why they were Prime
candidates for a mouse once someone had
the idea to put them there when they
were done with it the capshare's
navigation chip had been turned into a
General market Mouse sensor called the
Agilent hdns-2000 Agilent being HP
semiconductor division at the time it
was also called the h2000 for short and
that's exactly how you'll find it
labeled if you open up this the
Microsoft intellimous with intellii from
1999 the world's first Optical Mouse
and I mean exactly that this is the
first Optical Mouse because Xerox
I'm mad as hell at them for never
commercializing their product in a way
that mattered if you say that Xerox
invented the optical Mouse well that's
isn't it because it doesn't
really do Us justice they invent
something but in 17 years it never
helped me it never made it onto any of
our desks and they had plenty of time to
put it there I mean they licensed the
design to Mouse systems who produced a
PC version it got mentioned in a couple
magazines but if it sold more in a
couple hundred units I'd be shocked I've
never seen one except on eBay never seen
it mentioned anywhere in fact until I
went looking for one deliberately and
that's probably because in addition to
still requiring the funky mouse pad it
also cost over three hundred dollars
Xerox sold Mouse systems their 1983
design they didn't bother taking this
monumentally important concept any
further they didn't develop it into
something simpler and lower cost more
flexible it could actually be sold to
normal computer users and nobody else
was going to try if they were worried
about having a slap fight over the IP
with a massive litigious Corporation so
I think Xerox screwed us we could have
had these all along
I don't know if Apple knew about xerox's
product I think if they did though the
Mac would have shipped with one cost be
damned because there's nothing elegant
about a ball and even after the max
shipped even at that 300 price point
Xerox could have sold their product
unaltered to the people with enough
money to buy Apple's little graphical
workstations and their marketing would
have worked a lot better than Mouse
systems now if that had happened then
when mice came to the PC the ball design
would have been regressive inferior
cheap there would have been a race to
produce an affordable Optical design and
by the time I was conscious they would
have been commonplace but instead
well
I composed 95 of the script on a Mac
color classic and I was using the ball
mouse that it still would have shipped
with in 1993 and it reminded me how
miserable it was growing up with these
things I spent the whole goddamn time
astonished that we put up with them how
many years did we spend suffering with
ball mice only to find out that they
were obsolete even before the first
Macintosh came out before any
normal person not a college professor
any regular Joe had even heard of a
mouse at all Microsoft's product
director in 99 actually made the same
point he said can you imagine using a
computer designed in 1968 yet we think
nothing of using 30 year old mice
the microwave oven existed in the
mid-40s in some government lab I don't
care Raytheon sold to restaurants in the
50s I don't care it's the amount of
radar range that interests me it's the
thing that put this technology in
thousands and then millions of homes
that's where my thoughts go that's what
changed the world not from a
trickle-down perspective but when every
person got to lay their hands on it and
use it to shape their own life that's
what I think about you do you I don't
give Xerox a lick of credit for doing
nothing to improve the state of
computing for everyone Richard Lyon did
his best to contribute to humanity and
the corporation he worked for decided
not to bother letting us enjoy the
fruits of his labors so I say ah
Where'd I put the Microsoft one so I say
this is the world's first Optical Mouse
not the first one you could use in a
university computer lab or a particle
physicist office but the first one that
the world knew about that the world got
to appreciate that the world got to
benefit from this is it it starts here
at HP
or at least
we know that at the time you thought it
started at Microsoft because for some
reason they got all the credit
when Microsoft announced this uh it came
out of nowhere they just said here it is
an optical Mouse enjoy I didn't know HP
invented it until two days before I
wrote the script and I tried and tried
and I couldn't find anything in
contemporary media that ties Microsoft
or the intellimos or intellii back to
Agilent or HP I couldn't find any
magazine articles talking about the new
wave of optical mice so no opportunity
for any columnists to offhandedly
mention their involvement I've scoured
Microsoft's website from back in the day
they have pages about the technology how
it works how clever it is but none of
them quite say where it came from they
don't quite say they invented it they
don't quite say anybody else did I've
looked for patent citations in their
manuals I've read press releases but
nowhere is it mentioned that Microsoft
did not come up with this idea somebody
who edited Wikipedia knew about the
connection but their one citation is
actually invalid The Source doesn't
mention this at all and I can't find any
primary sources that do it actually
tripped up my research because for a
couple of days I was trying to find
Microsoft's patent to trace backwards
from and they don't have one I mean of
course not it's not their invention they
didn't bring anything to the table
except a plastic case which hearkened
back to the days of cereal mice and a
name that they pasted over hp's when I
finally found the patent it was of
course held by HP and in fact I could
have found it months ago because it's
actually referenced in the patent for
the Halo scanner Mouse along with hp's
own patent for the exact same thing
their design works pretty much the same
way except it uses a pair of linear
sensors instead of a webcam same concept
though and did I mention that patent was
filed in 1998 at the same time as the
ones for the cap share and the optical
Mouse itself all these ideas were
clearly organic ones they all fell
together rapidly all at once as soon as
this Optical navigation technology
occupied the same room as a bunch of
skilled Engineers full of imagination
and no preconceptions about what the
future could hold all these things float
around in your head as I I told you I I
you know military tracking correlation
at Stanford I think in your head these
things just kind of come together and
you realize that you know I should have
I should have thought of this years
ahead the time so it's you know it's
typical what something's invented for
doesn't necessarily
uh mean that's where its primary use is
going to end up being yeah could could
be different and yet HP decided not to
implement or take credit for any of it
themselves inexplicably they built the
cap share this weird Niche gadget for
nobody but they never bothered making a
mouse scanning or otherwise despite it
obviously being an enormous Mass Market
product
HP was making computers they were making
workstations in 1998 but they didn't
make an optical Mouse to sell with them
why why let Microsoft steal their
Thunder they could have sold billions
yeah it ended up in you know hundreds of
millions of optical mice they sold about
a billion of them
the only reference to this partnership
that I can find with all my resources
was an obscure page from hp's website
specifically about Gary Gordon so you
never have found it in which they
mentioned that he's partnering with
Microsoft to license this Tech under the
name mousejet a brand that they
carefully threw in the trash and buried
oh thank you for the trademark we don't
need anything like that though we'll use
our own it's particularly funny because
uh the next year Apple produced their
own Optical Mouse uh the Pro mouse which
also used the agile h2000 you can see it
right through the case I'll put a little
close up on the screen here it's the
same exact chip and they also made
absolutely no mention of where they got
it not in their press releases not in
their ads not even in the white paper
they produced to explain why their mouse
was better than the unnamed competition
they just said yep here's ours it's
improved as if this technology was years
old and commonplace they introduced no
special trademark name they didn't focus
on the cleverness of the technology
itself they just dropped their product
on the market like there was nothing to
say like Optical mice were just normal
now like they didn't want to discuss it
for some reason it seems almost like
there was a conspiracy to conceal the
inventor and I would say the invention
of the optical Mouse it's as if they
simply appeared and nobody wanted to
talk about where or who they came from
as if they'd always been around and I
don't understand that
I found them revolutionary completely
obviously the mechanical mouse in a
matter of a couple of years
did nobody but me notice how much better
these were I mean sure the early ones
had their problems I don't dispute that
to be honest when I got these I hooked
them both up and I was shocked at how
poorly they tracked I hadn't used first
gen Optical mice in almost 23 years and
I admit I didn't remember that they lost
their way so easily a pretty gentle
shove will make both of these mice freak
out and that was not great for gaming in
particular and the reviews from the time
point this out so yes at first these
were not a perfect replacement I get
that but they got better rapidly and I
still recall being astonished how much
better my first one performed than
anything I'd used before and to this day
anytime I end up having to use a ball
Mouse even briefly it's just infuriating
so personally I find it surprising that
we don't celebrate these so we don't
talk about where they came from nobody
seems to really care about the mouse
except in the context of companies like
Xerox and then only because of their
early history with the graphical user
interface because it's such a heavily
discussed and documented subject that
tons of people are interested in ever
every aspect of it xerox's involvement
with the mouse Optical and otherwise
gets swept up in our fascination with
the birth of the GUI itself in the late
70s so anything that was going on at the
time is worth discussing but who wants
to talk about the fascinating things
going on in Computing in 1998 outside of
the Glory Days of early 3D acceleration
I feel like that's where people start
tuning out as if Windows 95 came out so
history has ended we're just mopping up
and settling in for the Long Haul right
it's nothing worth mentioning but big
stuff was still happening stuff worth
remembering accurately and I think
that's what I've done I hope you agree
uh if so then consider subscribing to my
channel helps me know I'm getting things
right or at least people think I am
remember turn on notifications if you
want to know when I upload new stuff
because it's kind of getting irregular
these days but if you really like what
I'm doing then consider supporting me on
patreon like all these folks are doing I
couldn't afford to do this without them
uh because of you know my studio here
but also things like this mouse which I
had to jump on when it popped up on eBay
for forty dollars even though the next
day I found one locally for three bucks
but I gotta do what I gotta do and
sometimes that means spending more than
I'd like on a video uh and all my
patrons make that possible so thank you
all so much I couldn't do this without
you and everyone else thanks for
watching