hey guys welcome to the liberal Hive
minded Channel slowly focused on
exposing the Abundant hypocrisy of the
left I'm at a loss for words today you
know I've made a pretty concerted effort
here to not pay too much mind and not
provide excessive oxygen to these
ridiculous indictments because obviously
that's exactly what they want but of
course without playing into it too much
we have to address every single
indictment and here we go we're on our
third Jack Smith is the Oprah Winfrey of
indictments this one though it Takes the
Cake this is the worst one yet this
shows you just how far the Deep state is
willing to go to set new precedence to
essentially throw the constitution in
the trash they are willing to do
anything to go after Donald Trump
including indicting a former sitting
president for what exactly for simply
holding a political opinion we gotta rip
into this one folks we got some stuff to
get into so let's roll the tape alright
folks I'm sure your Twitter feed has
been filled with a bunch of controlled
opposition clowns making the case that
Donald Trump is guilty Ryan J Karim
writes the Trump case is not a First
Amendment case read the indictment it
specifically avoids that roadblock Jack
Smith is more Adept at the law than all
of you instant armchair lawyers Dawn and
his minions can scream all they want in
public and they will in order to ratchet
up support and grift you out of your
money but that means nothing in a court
of law where facts matter we are a
nation of laws not a nation led by mob
rule when criticized in the comments by
a random commenter writing Brian I
didn't know you don't have a JD so
please don't get snooty about anyone
being an armchair lawyer what you could
do is offer a shred of reasoning as to
why hiring lawyers and going into court
to contest an election is suddenly a
crime bet you can't Brian J Karim writes
read the indictment so he doesn't
actually clarify his stance he just
calls Trump a grifter and anybody who's
defending Trump an armchair lawyer then
when asked to clarify his stance he says
read the indictment great argument Joe
Walsh another clown on Twitter writes I
woke up two hours ago and read the
entire indictment for the second time
he's a traitor he's an s nothing traitor
to this country you cannot read that
indictment and come to a different
conclusion not if you care about our
democracy again he doesn't actually make
an argument they're just stating things
Trump a criminal read the indictment all
right well I've been through the
indictment multiple times and I came to
the conclusion that all of these
ridiculous actors are full of
you-know-what the indictment itself this
entire case first of all is a First
Amendment case and secondly is making a
claim of conspiracy and defrauding the
American public by using deceit and
false claims as described in the
indictment purpose of conspiracy the
purpose of the conspiracy was to
overturn the legitimate results of the
2020 election by using knowingly false
claims of election issues to obstruct
the federal government function by which
those results are collected counted and
certified so the fraud portion is purely
speculative it's based on an assumption
the assumption is that Trump was lying
and didn't actually believe the things
that were being told to him him how
exactly can you prove that let's not
even go into the whole Free Speech
element protected Free Speech political
opinions which citizens and politicians
have an absolute right to hold
regardless of whether or not those
opinions are perfectly accurate let's
just stick on what Jack Smith has to
prove Jack Smith has to prove that
within Donald Trump's brain he was
knowingly attempting to defraud the
public yeah unless there's some text
message or phone call where Donald Trump
basically lays out this whole scheme
that is an impossible ask it's
impossible to prove that that's the
first hole in this swiss cheese
indictment the second one is Donald
Trump's attorney clearly outlines is the
issue of free speech the state
legislatures have the ultimate ability
to qualify electors he followed that
advice now you may disagree as to
whether or not those things actually
occurred or not that's why we have
political debate we don't have criminal
trials over that we have the discussion
like we're just having these things
actually occurred or not John not under
the First Amendment it matters if those
things actually occurred because not at
all
if we're going to have a situation where
the Department of Justice is going to
fact check politicians and indict
politicians for political speech and
whether or not they're factually
accurate then this country will shut
down politically because it's a
never-ending cycle of Tit for Tat and
that's the risk of injecting politics
into the criminal justice system so
right now people disagree with President
Trump what's going to happen four years
from now if somebody disagrees with
President Biden in terms of what he said
during the election that's why we don't
criminalize political speech political
speech under the first amendment has has
an almost absolute protection nobody
gets to judge whether it's true or not
except the American people and we do
that in an election we do that in an
election we do that in the case of a
president by impeachment but we don't
indict people now of course CNN's
Caitlyn Collins tried her very best to
in engage once again in debate rather
than fact-based journalism which she is
I mean absolutely awful at we learned
that during the town hall once again she
is completely out of her depths on this
one I am failing to see the crime
holding a particular opinion is not
illegal thinking something happened
whether it did or not is not illegal and
even the process by which Donald Trump
approached it again not illegal even
CNN's van Jones ahead of the 2020
election essentially laid out the entire
thing in October arguing that there is
in fact a legal and constitutional
manner by which results can be
challenged there's a possibility that
the Republicans in the House of
Representatives could just anoint their
candidate to be president even without
the popular vote or a majority electoral
college that could happen now some
people would call that outcome a
perfectly legal
perfectly constitutional coup against
the very idea of majority rule in the
United States perfectly legal
perfectly constitutional that is
possible under our constitution
obviously I mean it's not exactly a
surprise to anyone the Democrats tried
doing it to Donald Trump back in 2016.
they argued vehemently on the house
floor to reject the results thereby
sending the results back to the state
and once again of course the double
standard applies reading Jack Smith's
indictment one of the first things that
comes to mind is well based on the way
that this indictment is written the only
person who actually belongs in prison is
Hillary Clinton I mean let's have a
conversation about engaging in malicious
lies to defraud the United States Russia
gate anyone Steele dossier anyone what
was it four illegal fisa warrants a
whole scheme an attempted impeachment a
special counsel investigation all based
on a clear fraud this is dangerous
territory folks this is dangerous
dangerous territory special counsel Jack
Smith has opened up a can of worms on
this one he has essentially unlocked new
president that enables the government to
indict politicians or even regular
citizens based on their opinions and
their analysis if you have an opinion
that doesn't conform to the official
narrative you're a criminal involved in
a conspiracy to defraud the United
States again the core component of Jack
Smith's little case here is based on the
following the indictment was issued by a
Grandeur of citizens here in the
District of Columbia
and it sets forth the crimes charged in
detail
I encourage everyone to read it in full
the attack on our nation's capital on
January 6 2021
was an unprecedented assault on the seat
of American democracy
described in the indictment it was
fueled by lies fueled by lies even if
that was the case since when is the
lying in Washington a crime I mean for
Pete's sake's Adam's shift should be
serving a life sentence multiple life
sentences at this point if that's the
case Uncharted Territory folks it's hard
to say what this is going to lead to
this case is a complete joke and boy oh
boy do I hope it all backfires in the
end we'll have to see and of course you
know I'll keep you guys updated on all
of it that's pretty much what I got for
you guys for now if you enjoyed the
video make sure to leave a like and
possibly subscribe to the channel thanks
for watching and I'll see you on the
next one