well i i would agree with matt we're
dealing with uh
in my uh opinion the larger issue
that a supreme court as an example could
look at
that indicates that there is a real
significant impact on whether or not
we can trust the end result of a vote
especially for a state like pennsylvania
so this is really about you know as
you've noted in your monologue as well
that there's always some kind of fraud
that's uh that's
unavoidable but but when you're dealing
with the most vulnerable voting dynamic
which are the mail-in ballots
um that that's the biggest issue and now
with it being about
50 of what came in
we have to be able to deal with the
nature of the legitimacy of this and if
it can be legitimate
so the bigger issue is yes if there's
machines like the dominion dynamic
that we know is in uh half of the
counties in michigan
and multiple states that would me and
that it
has a major problem perhaps it was the
servicer with software
that could become a big issue the other
issue of course and we've got the
recounts coming up in those recounts
like with georgia and wisconsin will
have one
is when the parties have a chance to to
kind of audit as well to see about
signatures
and the legitimacy of the ballots
themselves so
that could be significant because of the
volume of the mail-in
it becomes uh a key because look all we
have here it's
it's one thing for a winner to be
declared uh and it's another thing for
all of us to agree that's the core of
legitimate government
is that we as the population as a
citizenry agree
to be governed in this fashion yes
if we lose the ability to have faith in
the election
then the legitimacy goes that's the key
of what trump is doing here
is the legitimacy of all of this even
though it's happened in the past
it's perhaps bigger now and we all
deserve
to have answers about what happened