[Music]
Mr attorney general thank you so much
for being on the program the federal
government coming in to cut your border
your razor wire uh at your border um
first off your your take on this there
there is our take is there is no way
that the founders of the Constitution
would have ever intended the federal
government to be able to force an
invasion on a state that seems utterly
antithetical to the actual founding of
our nation which was to have 13
different states that that protected
themselves right am I correct in that I
mean I'm the one that filed this law I
it started happening you know when I got
impeached I couldn't do anything I can't
I saw it happening while I was out the
day I came back I brought this to my
staff and said we have to stop this
there's no way that the federal
government has the authority to damage
our property to stop us from defending
the border so just because we have a 54
ruling by the Supreme Court doesn't mean
they're right and it doesn't mean we're
going to help them damage our own
property and allow them to easily come
cut our prop our fences down it's still
wrong and we're actually still in this
case it's not over obviously it's a bad
sign when they get rid of the injunction
but we're actually still in this case on
the merits at the the trial level so
what is the path moving forward I've
seen some very strong statements out of
the Texas state legislator and the
governor uh whose administration you
serve uh what is the path forward here
more razor wire I'm seeing absolutely
more razor wire we're going to start
deporting people I think in March when
that goes effective we had legislation
passed and it goes into effect I think
in March and once they start reporting
people I'm sure the Biden Administration
will love that uh we are also still
protecting Shelby parks we're not
letting uh the border patrol in there to
process people they can come in if they
need to do some some emergency process
but we're not letting them in there just
to let more people in so you're right it
cannot be true that just because the
federal government not just ignores
their federal laws but actually AIDS and
abets the cartels in getting people here
because remember these people are coming
to our country they're being brought by
the cartels they're not hiding anymore
they're not trying to run from border
patrol I don't think people realize that
they're actually just being brought to
us and the Biden Administration is
helping get as many people here for the
very reason that you talked about with
the election as possible in this fast a
period of time before Biden is out of
office so can you please explain to me
who is certainly not a legal scholar nor
a lawyer uh how the how the Supreme
Court could could rule on this along you
know John Roberts of course to his great
shame but as predicted and Amy con
Barrett was I think was a surprise to
many people how they could possibly rule
that the
Constitution which was written by a
bunch of people that had just rejected
and repulsed the British Invasion of
their
homes uh would allow for the foreign
invasion of a state like H how do you
square that so they didn't actually give
us an explanation they just got rid of
the injunction so we don't actually have
an opinion letting us know what they why
they said this now we can go back to
Roberts you know 10 12 years ago when
that the USV Iona case came down he
cided with the liberal judges back then
and unfortunately now I was hoping with
the new justices that they would all
stick together against Roberts on this
issue or maybe Roberts could see the
error of his ways over the last 10 15
years in allowing that case to go
forward he's seen the consequences of of
not just Texas but really the entire
country and yet here he is again
blocking the States from protecting
their very young citizens from all types
of crimes and all potential of of even
terrorists coming across the border does
this mean no more Sanctuary cities I
right like so does this does this ruling
mean that the federal government can
just seize control of sanctuary cities
and that they have Supremacy here when
it comes to immigration policy so the
next Republican Administration just
marches directly into Sanctuary cities
and say this isn't a real thing yeah it
seems like that doesn't it it seems like
if if that's true if it's it's true on
one side it certainly seems like the you
know the feds can do it on the other
side which is say we're not going to
honor Sanctuary you can't do that
anymore we're going to you know move
these people out of here so you would
think that but none of this makes any
sense this is not the Constitution this
is a bunch of liberal judges ignoring
the fact that we have a right as a state
to protect ourselves and you're right it
goes back to the founding of our country
there's no way that the founders would
say oh yeah if if if the federal
government's not going to protect you
you have to let all the consequences and
potentially you know people dying you
have to let all those consequences
happen state
no no you have no right to fight back I
mean Madison actually talks about this
Federalist Papers they they multiple
articles in the Federalist Papers about
the potential of a foreign Invasion and
how the states are the first line of
defense and so now given this ruling I
guess you'd have to like re you'd have
to reverse engineer that but then state
that if a republican if a republican
became president and the federal
government has Supremacy here then a
republican could build a wall like Fort
Knox on the border and Democrats
couldn't do anything about I mean right
like isn't that can't you reverse
engineer this into like Texas like the
federal government can assist in Texas
like in a trump next Trump
Administration could assist in Trump
Texas in building like a like a a
militarized wall on the border including
crocodiles and a moat I I would think
exactly if if if the Supreme Court's
right and obviously you'd have to have
some Congressional approval because that
there there were actually none of this
is Congressional approval so you're
right I think you're right I think they
if if the Supreme Court's rationale is
correct any president can do anything
about immigration he wants and it's fine
according to the Supreme Court I love
reverse engineering this because like
people people you know Boom Clap you
know squee online Libs do and then they
don't understand like what happens when
Trump wins a 350 electoral vote
landslide in November and then comes in
and says oh well lucky me the Supreme
Court's decid I can build anything I
want On the Border because I have
Supremacy
here I actually started thinking about
this from the standpoint oh Congress has
got approval prove it but under their
Theory it's whatever Joe Biden wants to
do or doesn't want to do and then we
have no ability to stop it so if that's
true then presumably Trump can do
whatever he wants to do whether the
states like it or not or the federal
government's authorized it he can do it
okay so we're going to go full Game of
Thrones like the great white wall like
fantastic okay great thanks a lot again
I'm not arguing this is a good thing
obviously this is a this is clearly a
very bad thing and now you've had all
like the Republican Avengers have come
to your side it's actually quite neat to
see an enormous failings of Republican
Governors have been standing up uh for
Texas what Aid are they offering you uh
so far I mean it's just words but I do
think that that's encouraging because
hopefully this actually wakes the
Supreme Court up it wakes Congress up to
actually act or maybe change because
look there's up until now the Supreme
Court's never had any push back from
Republican Governors other than a few
you know like Abbott or maybe Ducey when
he was there and occasionally uh
DeSantis now if you have Republican
Governors align together to speak out I
think we've got a much better chance of
the Supreme Court maybe paying attention
and maybe switching one of those vs I'm
not sure maybe Roberts is a lost cause
but maybe Amy come Barrett is
not so this statement by Governor Greg
Abbott which I'm sure you had a hand in
helping craft that you have also uh
promoted on your ex account Mr attorney
general uh you say that you stand ready
to bring any legal means necessary to
defend Texas we push back against the
outof control federal government so what
does that mean because now people inside
of the Texas delegations are saying how
about you just Joe Biden should just
Wartime federalize the Texas National
Guard to just send American troops to
conquer Texas uh right like is is that
where we're heading if it is it's pretty
scary I mean I can't imagine that
occurring but look we're in Uncharted
Territory given the invasion that we
have and the federal government aiding
and abetting The Invasion and so we're
fighting our own government States we
need to realize this we are fighting we
may not be doing it with guns God help
us if we end up there but that is not
the situation we should be in the
federal government should be helping us
prevent the very bad con consequences of
allowing criminals and terrorists into
our country and it it it's it's hard to
believe that's where we're at so the
razor wire shall continue until morale
approves uh the deportations in the new
Immigration Act that was just passed and
signed into law those will begin this
spring do you believe that the federal
government will step in to stop you from
doing that Joe Biden's threatened to oh
I think they'll definitely try I mean
they've been emboldened by the Supreme
Court uh well I say Supreme Court five
members of the Supreme Court so I have
no doubt that they're confident that
Roberts and maybe Amy Barrett Amy con
Barrett will side with them I don't know
hopefully they'll they'll wake up and
realize the massive consequences to that
but we're not going to stop trying we
have to fight because we have an
obligation to help protect our citizens
if the Biden Administration is going to
do just the
opposite so article one of the
Constitution allows for the states
rights to self-defense has that just
been destroyed here what what's your
legal reason reading on this Mr attorney
general no I don't think you can ever
destroy the Constitution I mean whatever
they say it means and the words are are
pretty clear so I think we have a a
right and an obligation to defend our
borders when the federal government
fails to do that and it was contemplated
as you said by James Madison it was the
governor spoke of that himself that
there were times that the founders were
worried that the federal government
wouldn't step in and individual states
have the right and the moral obligation
to to to protect their citizens and
we're going to do it somehow some way
we're going to do it well uh godspeed in
all of that I have one final I guess um
uh potential scenario to discuss with
you that that I think might put this
into clearer context regularly I try as
hard as I can to explain this to to
liberals like what they are doing to
themselves regularly Vladimir Putin
talks about the purchase of Alaska and
Alaska is closer to Russia than it is to
Mainland America and talks about what a
mistake that was and how he wants to
take that back how how he wants to
dissolve uh that treaty and essentially
take back Alaska and so under this
ruling Alaska wouldn't be able to defend
itself from like a Russian invasion like
correct like you like the federal
government could and may decide that
Alaska just simply has to go back to the
Russians uh yeah and not just Bally Joe
Biden decides that I I I think they were
right you know they made a mistake in
the 1800s and and yeah just we're not
going to stop it let Russia have it and
under exactly under this Theory Alaska
would be just stuck uh they wouldn't be
they wouldn't supposedly be allowed to
do anything we know that they would do
everything they could to stop that from
happening but that is that is the theory
they would have no right as long as the
federal government because they are
preempted from protecting their
themselves they can't protect themselves
a PO such a poisonous political Theory
other than prayers how can our audience
help you Mr Atty Joe look just stay
engaged I mean keep talking about it I'm
I'm grateful that you are and uh
encourage you know your political
leaders to get involved if you're in
other states which we have people out
listening from all these states
encourage your Governor encourage your
attorney general to speak out about
what's going on because the more they
the more they hear from us in Washington
the more likely we are to get what we
need yes yes that is exactly right
there's true power in the people it
still is that way thank God that is what
Democrats are actually trying to solve
that's the the the X in the equation
that they were trying to solve with 30
million criminal illegal aliens in this
country is that to dilute your power as
a citizen don't let them do it God bless
you for fighting and God bless Texas
thank you thanks for having me on God
[Music]
spe